- Looking beyond the share price – a key lesson from CBL’s capitulation
- Rotation to large caps ‘uncomfortable’ but creating opportunities
- 30 years after 1987 – how stock market crashes can make you a better investor
- Avoiding the next Vocation: Five “watch outs” for selecting stocks
- Is the market expensive? Four reasons this is the wrong question to be asking
- What makes the table-topping Prime Value Cash Plus Fund tick?
- Stocks to watch in an uncertain market: CSL
- Two big takeouts for investors from 2016
- Five reasons why absolute return investing is less volatile than index investing
- Six keys to finding value in the market
- Brexit: Implications for investors
- Difficult start to 2016 for share market – opportunities exist for high conviction stock pickers
- Prime Value’s views on current market volatility
- Short-term cycles to continue into 2015
- Some stocks cope with volatility better than others
- Reporting Season Underlines Need For Strong Fundamentals
- In the world of finance, the most dangerous thing is the thing that never moves
- 2014 shaping as a stockpickers market
- Dark Clouds On The Horizon – Risk Or Opportunity?
- Three Chances at Getting it Right
- Keeping on top of the RORO markets
- Notes from China
- Spring Cleaning The Investment Pantry
- Does Corporate Memory Have A Role In Stockpicking?
- How Do You Harvest Your Returns?
- Why Avoiding the Herd is More Important than Ever
- Safe Bets In Turbulent Times
- History: First Multinational Renaissance Business
- How Bees Invest
Safe Bets In Turbulent Times
Fiona Clark, 17 August 2011
There is not really such a thing as a “safe bet”. We learned from our experiences in the GFC that quality, well run businesses with attractive earnings outlooks and strong balance sheets could still be sold heavily. Some even more so than their less attractive peers due to profit taking (as they had performed well) and blanket selling. They key difference however, was that these high quality companies bounced back much more quickly when conditions improved and outperformed over the whole cycle.
With this in mind, there are some ways we can reduce risk and provide some comfort during turbulent times. One of these is to invest in companies with indirect exposure to a particular risk factor. For example, we quite like the resources sector and many of the larger resources companies. However, by investing in companies that service the resources sector, our exposure to commodity prices is reduced. Most large resource projects have long lead time times so the earnings of the service companies are much more stable. One company in this realm is Campbell Brothers, a global laboratory and minerals testing business. The buoyant outlook for commodity prices should typically drive increased exploration. Despite this, management is aware of the cyclical risk of mineral dependency. They are therefore focused on continued diversification across sectors and geographies, especially environmental testing and industrial testing. They are also growing food testing capabilities. Campbell Brothers is a high quality business with good management.
Another way of ensuring limited downside risk is to look for companies whose valuation has been negative impacted by external factors which should not limit its future prospects. A good example here is Telstra, which has traded under a cloud of regulatory and political uncertainty for quite some time. With the announcement of the NBN deal, some of this uncertainty has lifted and management should be able to focus on running the business. We do not expect exceptional earnings growth from Telstra, but it provides defensive and stable earnings and a very attractive fully franked and sustainable yield. Most importantly, the valuation is is not stretched, limiting the potential downside during a financial market storm.
There is also the classic defensive investment strategy – which companies actually do BETTER when economic conditions are tough. Rather than the fancy restaurant, maybe we’ll have “restaurant night” at home. Instead of expensive specialty store brands, maybe the supermarket brands will suffice. The best example in our view in this category is Woolworths, which has a terrific history of providing strong returns on equity for shareholders and outperforming in difficult market conditions. Quality management who have delivered on their earnings promises, a simple and logical business model, a strong balance sheet and decent yield, Woolworths may not provide a “wow” growth factor but should certainly help investors sleep more easily at night in turbulent times.